IF THERE WEREN'T SO MANY CONTESTED CUSTODY CASES, THERE WOULD BE FEWER
CUSTODY EVALUATIONS GOING BAD

The reality is... the number of contested custody cases has steadily risen in most western countries since the mid 1980's. The reason is that around this time changes in the divorce laws finally recognized that "joint custody" was a preferable legal and practical post divorce arrangement for divorcing families when compared to traditional "sole custody". Until that time, sole custody almost always went to mothers while the financial responsiblity of paying children support almost always went to fathers. In these situations, specified access arrangements were rarely provided to the noncustodial parent and as such, the ability to maintain a relationship with children was often difficult. The intent of the new divorce laws was to rectify this problem by placing the responsibility for caring for children physically, emotionally and financial on both parents - not just one.

While the changes to the divorce laws seemed to solve one set of problems, new and more challenging ones soon began to emerge. The idea that the best interests of children would be served by having both parents in their lives which included the responsible for their care was not embraced by all divorcing parents. The linch pin appeared to be the recognition that post divorce financial support was no longer the domain of the noncustodial parent and was instead, to be a shared responsibility. Suddenly, there were financial incentives for both mothers and fathers to find grounds for why joint custody would not work. For mothers, the incentive was to hold onto child support while for fathers it was not to pay it. So out of this dilemma, a whole new legal challenge emerged - the contested custody case!

Due to the increasing number of custody cases being litigated, judges find making decisions about custody to be very challenging particularly since they have virtually no personal knowledge of the family members involved. Moreover, apart from points of law and legal procedure, judges are generally ill-equipped to make decisions about which of the two warring parents are best able to provide for their children. Given these circumstances, the most logical solution seemed to have a professional who had expertise in the areas of child development, family dynamics and psychopathology to evaluate the family members and then make recommendations to the court about custody and access.

Need More Information?

Everyone's concerns are unique. For that reason, Dr. Reena Sommer invites you to call her without obligation for a 15-minute consultation to receive some initial direction about your specific concerns. You can reach Dr. Sommer directly by calling her at 281.534.3923.

*FYI: We are not attorneys nor are we members of any bar in any state. We do not offer legal advice nor do we present ourselves as doing so. However, we do help attorneys to better represent their clients through our services as divorce strategists and divorce consultants.